Architecture as a
Medium for Revealing


A reflection on technology, nature, and the search for
meaning in architecture.

By Juan Carlos Portuese


Caspar David Friedrich, Wanderer above the Sea of Fog (1818), oil on canvas, Hamburger Kunsthalle. Public domain.


Technology is often described as a tool, a means to an end. Martin Heidegger begins The Question Concerning Technology by acknowledging this common definition, but he soon reminds us that this understanding is not the real essence of technology (Heidegger 1977). If we think of technology only as an instrument, we also assume we can fully control it. This leads us into a comfortable illusion: that any problem created by technology can simply be solved through more technology.

For Heidegger, this mindset is part of what he calls Enframing (Gestell), a way of understanding the world that orders everything into resources waiting to be used. The danger is not technology itself, but the reductive way of seeing that comes along with it. When everything becomes raw material, we lose sight of intrinsic value. We even begin to see human beings through the same lens: useful for what they can do, rather than meaningful for who they are.

Today, many of our most celebrated movements fall into this same instrumental logic. Sustainability, for example, is increasingly framed as a technological problem to be solved through metrics, carbon counting, and optimization. It masquerades as planetary care while often treating the Earth as a system of inputs and outputs, forgetting that what is truly at stake is human and ecological relational existence. Digital design carries a similar risk: tools that could deepen our understanding are instead used to generate novelty, efficiency, and formal spectacle.

But Heidegger also insists that the danger of Enframing hides a saving power, for it awakens us to our worldly responsibilities, preserving truth as Aletheia, the unconcealment where beings come out of hiddenness and show themselves as what they are. Truth in this case is an ontological condition. Before facts or propositions can be true, the world must already be open, already revealed to us. For Heidegger, humans (“Dasein”) are not passive observers, our being-in-the-world is part of how the world becomes unconcealed.

If we can recognize this mode of thinking, we can also step outside of it. Heidegger turns to the figure of the artist as the example of a different way of revealing truth, one that is grounded in openness, in attention, in letting the world show itself rather than forcing it into categories or measurements. Art allows truth to emerge rather than trying to control it. (Heidegger 1977).


Architecture between Nature and Technology


Architecture, like technology, is often assumed to be a means to an end. Program, form, codes, and building science define most decisions. Even when we pursue experience or atmosphere, we usually frame it in terms of delivering something, either affect, emotion, or, comfort. Instrumentality becomes both the starting point and the boundary.

Defining architecture only through its instrumentality places it within the same danger that Heidegger describes for technology. Architecture risks becoming an extension of Enframing: a system of spaces optimized to perform tasks, solve problems, and control conditions. Yet the instrumentality of architecture cannot be separated from life. The programmatic dimension of architecture is not an imposition on meaning but a recognition that buildings, like technology, are embedded in the conditions of existence. Both have infused themselves so deeply into human life that their functional demands are indispensable. Our built environment relies on this instrumentality to such an extent that it becomes necessary for living itself.

But necessity does not negate meaning. The challenge is not to reject instrumentality but to understand it as only one layer of a larger relational field. Technology, like the natural world, is fundamental to our existence and has already become a second nature, not separate from us, not subordinate, but intertwined with how we inhabit the world.

This intertwining opens a different possibility: to orient function, form, building science, and technology toward performance.

Architecture can be programmed to bring nature out of concealment.

Performance, then, extends beyond its instrumentality. It becomes a vehicle for revealing the underlying forces of the world, such as light, air, material, gravity and time. Architecture becomes a mediator between the natural world (primary nature) and the technological world we have created (second nature). When we design in this way, buildings prepare us and enable us to be present to the world.

In this sense, the architect’s role moves closer to that of the artist in Heidegger’s writing: a participant in the unfolding of truth rather than a controller of outcomes.


Precariousness, Transcendence, and Human Experience


To understand what it means to “prepare” someone to encounter nature or truth, we have to look at human experience itself, especially the precariousness of existence.
The word precarious comes from the Latin precarius, meaning “obtained by entreaty,” archaic for negotiation, or dependent on something beyond our control. It signals uncertainty, instability, and contingency. Although we tend to treat precariousness as something to avoid, the term actually points to a deeper significance. 

To grasp our precarious existence, start with the concept of transcendence. 

In Being and Time, Heidegger describes human existence (Dasein) as fundamentally transcendent, always stepping beyond itself, always living within possibilities, always aware (even if quietly) of its own finitude (Heidegger 1962). Transcendence forges individuality through temporality. We exist in relation with others, and together we constitute the world. This shared vulnerability is not a flaw but a condition of meaning.

Paul Tillich, writing at the same time as Heidegger, speaks of moments of ontic shock, sudden, often painful experiences that break through the routines of life and make us aware of our fragility (Tillich 1952). The death of a loved one, for example, makes finitude impossible to ignore. In these moments, the world becomes sharply real.

Karl Rahner, one of Heidegger’s students, describes something similar in his idea of transcendental experience. We are not only aware of the world; we are always, at some level, aware of ourselves as subjects encountering the world. Crisis makes this implicit awareness explicit; it strips away the distractions of everyday life, and we see ourselves more clearly (Rahner 1978). For Rahner, transcending does not mean escaping the world; it means entering it more deeply and embracing the "other" to reclaim freedom.

In transcending, we do not move beyond the world, we move further into it. In being affected by circumstances outside our control, we reconnect with ourselves as subjects who still possess some measure of freedom. In these moments, we do not turn away from the precariousness of our existence; we embrace it. And in doing so, we more fully partake in life. Precariousness becomes a gateway to revealing. When we acknowledge our vulnerability, we become more attuned, more present, and more open.


The Revealing Power of Architecture


If revealing emerges through precariousness, openness, and the act of stepping beyond ourselves, then architecture has a profound role to play.

Buildings can either hide the world from us or bring us into deeper contact with it. They can dull our senses or heighten them. They can reinforce sameness or awaken us.

Architecture can frame light. It can choreograph movement. It can expose the natural forces that sustain us. It can show us our relationship with the material makeup of the universe. It can remind us of our embeddedness in both primary nature and second nature. It can integrate technology not to dominate nature but to help us perceive it. By doing so, it helps us understand the precarious, relational, finite, and transcendent conditions that shape our human life.

In this sense, architecture becomes not a measurer or an organizer, but a participant in the unfolding of truth.

Architecture becomes a medium that prepares us to feel, to notice, and to be aware of the world as it reveals itself.

This, ultimately, is an architectural stance toward both nature and technology: not opposition, not submission, but reciprocity. A space where primary nature and second nature meet, live in relation to each other, inform one another, and reveal something deeper about human existence.
A framework for meaningful living.


References


Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and Time. Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. New York: Harper & Row.
Heidegger, Martin. 1977. The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Translated by William Lovitt. New York: Harper & Row.
Rahner, Karl. 1978. Foundations of Christian Faith: An Introduction to the Idea of Christianity. New York: Seabury Press.
Tillich, Paul. 1952. The Courage to Be. New Haven: Yale University Press.








ABOUT
Juan Carlos Portuese
SENECA POLYTECHNIC
Higher Education
CENTENNIAL COLLEGE
Higher Education
PEEL REGIONAL POLICE 23 DIVISION
Institutional
TORONTO WESTERN HOSPITAL
Healthcare
HYBRID TIMBER SUPERTALL TOWER
Prototype
CALGARY CANCER CENTRE
Healthcare
PEEL REGIONAL POLICE OSF
Institutional
MINA RASHID MASTERPLAN
Urban Design
M_GIC PROTOTYPE
Housing
MASS TIMBER LAB PROTOTYPE
Science & Technology
CATALYST 77 WADE
Science &Technology
KANEKO TRUCK-A-TECTURE
Installation
MOHAWK COLLEGE
Higher Education
OAK RIDGES LIBRARY
Civic
WESTERN UNIVERSITY
Higher Education
2371 PERU ST.
Residential
SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY
Higher Education
CHENG RESIDENCE
Residential
UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO
Higher Education
PITT RIVER MIDDLE SCHOOL
K-12 Education
SC LOMBARDY ELEMENTARY
K-12 Education
MOI MEDICAL CITY PROJECT
Sports & Recreation
ZONAMERICA CAMPUS
Master Planning
HARBOR-UCLA MEDICAL CENTER
Master Planning
CASE STUDY HOUSE
Residential
VISITOR CENTER & HOSTEL
Hospitality
MARACAIBO MUSIC INSTITUTE
Higher Education
GLAZING ASSEMBLY
Installation